Tracing AI Handwriting Breakdowns Across the System
Mapped handwriting issues to model, sensor, protocol, or interaction layers.
Turned ambiguous failures into routed QA criteria.
Alex Rudnicki
Research and strategy for complex human systems.
Selected work
View all workReframing Slide Access as a Live Workflow Problem
Mapped live slide-access gaps for Blind and low-vision participants.
Defined live-access criteria for slide delivery.
Scaling Research Infrastructure for AI Accessibility Studies
Built a verified Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing recruitment and access workflow.
Converted access logistics into a reusable study workflow.
Research highlights
A generic non-invasive neuromotor interface
for human-computer interaction
Contributed to large-scale Reality Labs studies on handwriting and gesture models designed to generalize across people.
Opens in a new tab.Making Social Video Accessible by Design
Analyzed 1,000+ social videos for NSF-funded research identifying recurring access barriers across digital video platforms.
Opens in a new tab.Leadership
Leadership and Career Accelerator coaching at NIU.
Coach and develop a Braven Fellow cohort through UNIV 301, leading weekly learning labs and individualized feedback.
Opens in a new tab.Leading career development for NIU psychology students.
Lead workshops and 1:1 mentorship for NIU psychology students through career planning and early-career decisions.
About
I’m a researcher and strategist with a background in psychology, HCI, accessibility, and human-AI interaction. I thrive in complex, multidisciplinary environments where teams are still making sense of the problem: a workflow breaking across handoffs, a model behaving unpredictably, an access barrier built into a system, or a question that needs clearer evidence before teams can move with confidence.
I use mixed-methods research to turn ambiguity into strategy, mapping how people interact with systems, identifying where experiences break down, and translating findings into decisions teams can act on. My work connects research, product strategy, accessibility, and systems-level thinking.
My background in ASL and Deaf Studies shaped how I think about access: not as accommodation, but as infrastructure. The best systems are designed so people can understand them, trust them, and use them without carrying the burden of the system’s gaps.
Perspectives
-
Accessibility is infrastructure
Systems work better when disabled people shape them from the start. Accessibility is infrastructure for systems people can understand, trust, and use.
-
Models are not the whole experience
Benchmarks show what a model can do. Research shows whether people can understand it, recover from failure, and trust it in use.
-
Exclusion is a systems problem
When interfaces, workflows, and handoffs fail to connect, people are left to fill the gaps. Accessibility depends on the whole system supporting it.
Contact
Building something complex?
Open to collaborations and conversations around complex systems, accessibility, and human-AI interaction.
PDF document, 2 pages. Opens in a new tab.